Famed British sleuth says former FBI director James Comeyâs testimony is âMore full of misdirections and sleights of hand than a circus conjuror.â
LONDON â Sherlock Holmes, the celebrated Victorian private eye, emerged from the shadows of literary history last night to repeat his famous question, âWhy didnât the watchdog bark?â

Interviewed via GoogleSeance(TM) satellite by Rachel Maddow, the famous detective said that the FBIâs failure to investigate President Trump âis directly analogous to the case of the missing race horse, Silver Blaze, as detailed by my biographer, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle.â
In Doyleâs account, the following critical exchange takes place between Holmes and Scotland Yardâs dunderhead Inspector Gregory:
Gregory: Is there any other point to which you would wish to draw my attention?
Holmes: Yes, to the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.
Gregory: The dog did nothing in the night-time.
Holmes: That was the curious incident!
âIt was elementary, my dear Maddow,â Holmes continued last night. âI immediately grasped the significance of the silence of the dog. Obviously the midnight visitor was someone whom the dog knew well. It was the horseâs owner who removed Silver Blaze from his stall and led him out on to the moor.â
Adjusting his deer stalker, Holmes drew the parallel. âIn the same way, Comeyâs failure to launch an investigation into President Trump himself, when everyone else associated with his campaign was and still is under scrutiny, including his own son-in-law, shows that the FBI Director was quietly protecting the arch-criminal.
âKnowing that he couldnât openly agree to Trumpâs demand for personal loyalty, Comey nevertheless sought to provide the required assurance by shielding the President from direct investigation. Three times he informed him that was the case.
âComey thus hoped to hang on to his job which, as he himself revealed in his recent testimony, was in deep jeopardy. There is nothing more deceptive,â he added, âthan the obvious.â
Holmes concluded the interview by noting that the FBI Director had again signaled his partisanship by the way he handled Hillary Clintonâs emails, âwhich, as the whole world knows, successfully torpedoed her campaign in its final days and rescued Trumpâs floundering candidacy.
âComey hoped Trump would understand that while he couldnât openly pledge his loyalty, the President could reliably count on him when the chips were down.
âUnfortunately for him, the Orange Idiot was too involved with himself to recognize the gift silently proffered, with consequences we all now know.
âComeyâs testimony is his revenge while still covering his own ass. He has emerged from this mess with his reputation intact. The former FBI Director is, as you Americans say, one really smart cookie.â